TradehouseBuyer guides & toolsPricingPart of TradeHouseTradeHouse Fidelity Lab · Buyer resources
QuantConnect alternative for validation
People searching for a QuantConnect alternative for validation are usually not looking for another place to write algorithms. They have a backtest or a live trade log and want to know whether the edge is real. That is a different job from the one QuantConnect is built around, and the two products are more complementary than competing.
Two different jobs
| QuantConnect | Fidelity Lab | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | Research, backtest and deploy algorithms on the open-source LEAN engine, in the cloud or locally | Grade a set of trades you already have and say whether the edge survives |
| Input | Your algorithm code and its data subscriptions | A CSV or JSON of trades (legs) from any source, including QuantConnect exports |
| Output | Backtest statistics, equity curve, live or paper trading | A verdict (SURVIVES, DISSOLVES or UNTESTABLE), contamination findings with leg counts, cost-netted P&L, walk-forward result, adequacy and multiplicity checks |
| Fee treatment | Fee models are configured inside the algorithm | Ignores the fee in the file and re-nets from a per-venue schedule, labelling how each leg was priced |
| Can it refuse to grade? | Not its purpose | Yes: UNTESTABLE when independent days are too few or the market family has no ruler |
| Prediction-market support | See the vendor's documentation for current venues | Binary-market handling is built in, including closing-line value against a close_fair column you supply |
Pricing for QuantConnect is on its pricing page (opened 2026-10-28). No QuantConnect figure is reproduced here because the page's plan amounts could not be string-matched to a specific claim, and a stale number would be worse than none.
Why a platform's own backtest is not a validation
A backtest engine is designed to simulate the algorithm you wrote. If the algorithm contains a lookahead error, a stale quote or a rule tuned on the whole history, the engine will faithfully report the flattering result. Validation needs an independent pass over the output: were any records created after the outcome they predict, are the NO-side legs scored with the YES convention, does the whole submission live in a handful of independent days, and how many cohorts did you try before this one?
What the independent pass checks
- Lookahead: an outcome or feature stamped before entry, or a record created after the outcome it predicts (blocker severity).
- Mark tautology: the exit price is the contemporaneous mid, so the P&L is an accounting identity rather than a trade (blocker).
- Signed-PnL direction: NO-side legs scored as YES, which manufactures profit (blocker).
- Duplicate legs: identical timestamp, ticker, side, size and price rows inflating the sample.
- Span adequacy: too few independent days to support any conclusion.
A sensible combined workflow
- Build and backtest in whatever environment you prefer, including QuantConnect.
- Export the fills as a trade file.
- Run the free Fidelity Lab report to see the contamination findings and walk-forward verdict.
- If something is flagged, fix it at the source and re-run. The five-audit pack at $399 is priced for exactly this loop.
- Only after a SURVIVES verdict, size up or go live.
Fidelity Lab pricing
| Fidelity Lab option | Price | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 1 report a month, up to 5,000 legs, all 11 contamination detectors, cost-netted P&L and a full walk-forward verdict |
| One audit | $99 one-time | A single report without a subscription |
| Five-audit pack | $399 one-time | Five reports, useful when you want to re-test after fixing what the first one flagged |
| Starter | $49 per month | 10 reports a month, up to 100,000 legs, CSV and JSON upload, Benjamini-Hochberg control across every cohort you submit |
| Pro | $149 per month | Unlimited reports, up to 2,000,000 legs per run, report API and webhook, scheduled re-runs of a saved book |
If you need a place to write and run algorithms, you need a platform, and Fidelity Lab is not one. If you need a second opinion on whether the output of any platform is trustworthy, that is what it is for.
Frequently asked questions
Can I upload a QuantConnect backtest?
Export the fills as CSV or JSON trade legs. The report grades the trades in the file regardless of which engine produced them.
Does Fidelity Lab execute trades?
No. It grades historical trades and returns a report. A read-only broker connection is listed as rolling out on the Pro plan.